Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #828

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Thanks again for all of your help through out all of this. I’ve learned a lot.

    I’ll be a Senior Global Program Manager for IBM’s Transition and Transformation Team. I hope I’ll need to use PowerPivot at some point. Also, VBA and my other Excel skills.

    I’ll continue to be a member of the community and hopefully help others.

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #826

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Hi Tom,

    Looks like I’m moving to a new job. So, I won’t be needing to use this. The good news is I read both of Rob’s books, Kasper’s, and watched all of Rob’s 22 hr course. 🙂

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #611

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Hi Tom,

    It’s really all over the place. The SN on the system is one source. But the vendors may not use that completely and remove the first 2 digits and replace them with 00. The internal sources are manually entered and may or may not use the full serial #.

    There are probably 3-4 sources of 3000 serial #s I’m tracking. There are some duplicates, but I can try to work around that or build a solution for that. I thought it might be useful to create some kind of table that builds a relationship between these different “unique” serial #s. 🙂

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #608

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Hi Tom,

    Question for you. I have a situation where the Serial # we are tracking should be unique and should match between all sources of record, but they often don’t.
    I assume this is a common issue. What’s the best way to handle it? A lookup table that lists the various forms of the serial # across the various sources?

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #588

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    I think I did it…. thoughts?

     

    Cost Post Cancellation:=CALCULATE([Sum of Maintenance Cost],

    filter(Costs, Costs[MonthStart]>=RELATED(Tracking[Maintenance Start Date])
    &&

    Costs[MonthStart]<related(Tracking[Cancellation Effective Date])

    ||

    ISBLANK(related(Tracking[Cancellation Effective Date]))

    &&

    Costs[MonthStart]>=RELATED(Tracking[Maintenance Start Date])))

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #586

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    or… maybe this isn’t done in that table, my bad. My calculate cost post calculation measure does this now. I tried this, but it’s not working. Thoughts?

     

    Cost Post Cancellation:=CALCULATE([Sum of Maintenance Cost], filter(Costs, ISBLANK(related(Tracking[Cancellation Effective Date]))||Costs[MonthStart]>=RELATED(Tracking[Maintenance Start Date]) && Costs[MonthStart]<related(Tracking[Cancellation Effective Date])))

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #585

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Hi Tom,

    I’m trying to update the linkback table to introduce the concept of maintenance start dates. I added the following line that’s bolded. Any thoughts on how I’d achieve this?

     

    EVALUATE
    SUMMARIZE(FILTER(CALCULATETABLE (CROSSJOIN (Tracking,Months)),
    ISBLANK([Maintenance Cancellation Request Date])
    ||[Maintenance Cancellation Request Date]>date(2014,12,31)
    ||[Maintenance Start Date]>=[MonthStart]
    ),
    [Frame SN],
    [Monthly Maintenance],
    [MonthStart],
    [Cost Type]
    )
    ORDER BY[Frame SN],[MonthStart],[Cost Type]

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #506

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Tom,

    Thank you so much for all your help.

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #503

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Tom,

    Is there a way to filter out quarterly & yearly sums from a pivot?

    I have a situation where my monthly values are correct, but not when rolled up.

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #499

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    I ended up filtering them out via the linkback table. I think I did this correctly:

    EVALUATE
    SUMMARIZE(FILTER(CALCULATETABLE (CROSSJOIN (Tracking,Months)),
    ISBLANK([Maintenance Cancellation Request Date])
    ||[Maintenance Cancellation Request Date]>date(2014,12,31)
    ),
    [Frame SN],
    [Monthly Maintenance],
    [MonthStart]
    )
    ORDER BY[Frame SN],[MonthStart]

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #498

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Sorry for all the posts.

    I was able to get around that by basically copying the values in a new column. Not the best way, but it got me back in action.  Here’s the formula I have that works..

     

    Cost Post Cancellation:=CALCULATE([Sum of Maintenance Cost], filter(Costs, ISBLANK(related(Tracking[Cancellation Effective Date]))||Costs[MonthStart]<related(Tracking[Cancellation Effective Date])))

    One Issue I have is that my tracking table has 2014 cancellations in it, but my cost table starts at 1/1/15.  Should I filter those 2014 cancellations out of my cost table? (probably)… .or filter them out in the measure?

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #495

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Tom,
    Any ideas on this one?

     

    ============================
    Error Message:
    ============================

    The following system error occurred: Type mismatch.
    Datatype conversion failed for [Table: ‘Tracking’, Column: ‘Maintenance Cancellation Effective Date’, Value: ”].

    —————————-
    The following system error occurred: Type mismatch.
    Datatype conversion failed for [Table: ‘Tracking’, Column: ‘Maintenance Cancellation Effective Date’, Value: ”].
    ============================
    Call Stack:
    ============================

    at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.BackEnd.DataModelingSandbox.ExecuteCaptureLogAndProcessResults(OperationType type, Boolean cancellable, Boolean raw, Boolean raiseEvents)
    at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.BackEnd.DataModelingSandbox.ExecuteAMOCode(OperationType type, OperationCancellability cancellable, AMOCode code, Boolean raiseEvents)
    at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.BackEnd.SandboxTransaction.CommitUpdates()
    at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.BackEnd.SandboxTransaction.CommitInternal(Boolean finalCommit)
    —————————-
    at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.BackEnd.SandboxTransaction.CommitInternal(Boolean finalCommit)
    at Microsoft.AnalysisServices.Common.SandboxEditor.DataTypeSelectionChanged(String newSelectedString, TableWidgetGridControl grid, List`1 selectedColumns)

    ============================

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #494

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Hi Tom,

    The “effective date” takes into consideration all that logic we talked about for the different products. A very large IF/then statement to determine when cost will actually stop.

    Future = Forecasted decommission. I should probably have a “Forecasted Migration Effective Date” Also… since you can’t claim that cost savings/avoidance right away.

    For example, 1 product only allows maintenance updates twice a year. Another allows for it next day.

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #492

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Here’s how I translated that…

     

    Cost Post Cancellation:=CALCULATE([Sum of Maintenance Cost], filter(Costs, ISBLANK(Tracking[Maintenance Cancellation Effective Date])||Costs[MonthStart]<Tracking[Maintenance Cancellation Effective Date]))

    Now, how do I add the related?

     

    in reply to: Waterfall Cost Reductions #490

    dspblues
    Participant
    • Started: 1
    • Replies: 41
    • Total: 42

    Thanks. So right now, my cost table is very simple. [Frame SN], [Monthly Maintenance], [Month Start], [Cost Month], [Cost Year].

    Nothing has been filtered at all.

    In the tracking table, that’s joined via Frame SN, I have:

    [Maintenance Cancellation Effective Date], [Future Maintenance Cancellation] (date)

    I haven’t added the “F” (Future) or “A” (Actual) column yet, but I could.

     

    Do I need to change what data is included in the costs table? I thought Tracking filtering could flow into the costs table.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 41 total)